New Zealand citizens brought suit in Fulton County (Atlanta) for wrongful death of a family member in a plane crash in Australia. The defendants are a US manufacturer based in Kansas and a used aircraft dealer based in Georgia. The trial court dismissed the suit on the ground of forum non conveniens prior to enactment…
Continue reading ›Articles Posted in State Procedure
Abuse of injured immigrants is an old story. I once knew an insurance claims manager who was very proud of his tactics in dealing with Hispanic immigrants who had injury claims. First, he told them, “No English, no dinero.” Second, he would schedule meetings with claimants and get someone from INS to show up, check…
Continue reading ›A bill offered by a Macon legislator would strip the Georgia Supreme Court of the authority to set educational qualifications for Bar applicants who are already admitted in another state. Paul Kilpatrick, speaking for the Board of Bar Examiners, said that under the bill, “Georgia’s standard would be reduced to the lowest standard in the…
Continue reading ›Critics of Daubert see science as a contentious process, rather than a a set of universal facts deduced by logic, and argue that courts are now demanding more of individual scientists and engineers than is expected of them in their own research and practice. A synthesis of the two views of science can be achieved…
Continue reading ›As Georgia lawyers and judges wander into the quagmire of the Daubert Trilogy, we must look behind the curtain of the Wizard of Oz and begin to learn something of the epistomology of science. Insofar as the Daubert decision is based largely upon the Justice Brennan’s summary of the Karl Popper’s premise of theory-testing through…
Continue reading ›Two cases decided in November 2004 help to clarify the often befuddling concept legal doctrine of “proximate cause” in Georgia jury instructions. In John Crane Inc. v. Jones, 278 Ga. 747, 604 S.E.2d 822 (2004), the Supreme Court of Georgia held that it is error to charge that each of multiple defendants must have been…
Continue reading ›Nineteen years ago, the Georgia Supreme Court decided the case of Yost v. Torok, 256 Ga. 92, 344 S.E.2d 414 (1986), holding that any party who brings or defends an action, or any part thereof, that lacks substantial justification or is imposed for delay or harassment, could be liable for a common law tort of…
Continue reading ›











